Introduction
Corpus delicti
The idea behind this book was to gather my articles about
crime fiction and my reviews of detective novels published in
La Presse, Alibis, Entre les Lignes and
other publications where I had been wreaking havoc as a specialized
critic for many years. Hence the initial title, Chroniques
policières (Crime Chronicles) (since in French
"chronique" can mean a newspaper column as well as
a "chronicle"). But when I began working on it, I soon
realized that stringing together dozens of disparate texts was
not enough to make a coherent book. The idea therefore evolved,
as well as the approach. The title was changed, the initial structure
was revised and you are now holding the final result. It is still
based on my previous essays, but they have been rewritten, rearranged
and gathered into chapters with specific themes, with the addition
of significant amounts of new material.
Crime Scenes (An Investigation of the Contemporary Crime
Novel) is the first part of what might eventually become
a series, the goal of which will be to provide a descriptive,
analytical and critical panorama of the crime novel as we enter
the 21st century. Both a reading guide and a critical and thematic
analysis, this book is composed of eight chapters that successively
explore various facets of the genre, various "crime scenes":
essential components or sub-genres (police procedural, thriller,
mystery, suspense), Canadian geography (the Quebec crime novel
and the English Canadian crime novel), and thematic aspects (crime
novels written by women, crime novels and war, the crime novel
and westerns). An introductory chapter attempts to clarify the
standard terminology of crime novels, describe their numerous
variations and map their development as completely as possible
as we begin the third millennium.
Each chapter is supplemented by a list of reading suggestions
for those who wish to delve deeper into the subject. The book
ends with another bibliography that lists international studies
(literature, authors, characters, movies, television) that have
been published since the beginning of the century.
The book is not, however, intended to be an academic work.
Although it is well documented, Crime Scenes is intended
for the general public of crime novel readers as well as recognized
experts. It is a subjective, very personal tour through the ins
and outs of a popular genre that has become considerably more
complex in the last thirty years and that more and more often
represents many of the bestsellers in bookstores. In recent years,
it has supplanted science fiction and historical novels, taking
the place of the great sagas à la Michener and
company, and is a serious threat to romance fiction, a field
it has even begun to invade in the guise of romantic thrillers,
a sweet-and-sour hybrid that I don't much care for!
While, obviously, there is abundant and wide-ranging production,
with new authors regularly coming to the fore throughout the
western world, it is also true that a significant proportion
of the published books is of poor quality, repetitious, with
themes that are difficult to keep fresh (serial killers, damsels
in distress, Dan Brown imitators, romance dressed in black, and
so on).
As a reviewer, I've always given precedence to crime novels
that are really worth reading. Given the astounding number of
titles published each year, why should anyone waste their time
on books of little value, when it is physically impossible to
do justice to all the quality books? Sometimes, however, you
feel obliged to warn the readers about certain works, especially
when they are written by authors who are considered to be "safe
bets" or when they benefit from so much publicity overkill
that it seems impossible that the book could be bad or second-rate.
And yet... Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code may well have
sold in the millions, it is still a second-rate novel, a shoddy
thriller with many shortcomings. Henning Mankell, Michael Connelly
and Ian Rankin are among my favourite writers, but they also
sometimes publish novels that are clearly not as good as their
other works. The reviewer's responsibility is to show the flaws,
to separate the wheat from the chaff and to warn the readers
who trust him that such and such a book is not very good. Of
course, this same critic's opinion is always highly subjective,
even though it may be based on a long reading experience, an
unquestionable familiarity with the genre and a knowledge that
is hopefully trustworthy. It is always in the end just one very
personal point of view among others. He must therefore be given
the benefit of the doubt as well as the right to err, even though
he is always sure he is right (which is probably not the
case...). For, as Joe E. Brown tells Jack Lemmon in the memorable
ending of Some Like It Hot: "Nobody's perfect!"
Table of Contents